We don’t need paid professionals to do retweeting for us. They’re slicing up the attention pie thinner and thinner, giving us retreaded rehashes of warmed over news, all hoping for a bit of attention because the issue is trending. We can leave that to the unpaid, I think.
Retweeting actual news can have a journalistic purpose, but rehashing the tweets about an event as an event in itself, that’s not the way I would like to see things go forward.
As for news, it’s a commodity now. Period. Journalists could be filters for the important bits of information. Background information. Too bad their audience lusts for stories to share with their friends.
Like the old gatekeepers, the engineers who write the new gatekeeping code have enormous power to determine what we know about the world. But unlike the best of the old gatekeepers, they don’t see themselves as keepers of the public trust. There is no algorithmic equivalent to journalistic ethics.
Twitter Updates
- Morgen gaan ze hier beneden de armoede oplossen. Jij mag ook meedoen. We doen dan ineens samen een koffie. Goed? bit.ly/JxnaZH 12 minutes ago
- Ze hebben mij gewoon geheadhunt #likeaboss maar ik heb gezegd dat ik graag bij @flandersdc werk #likeanemployee 1 hour ago
- Ze hebben @krisvdv zijn fotografieverhaal laten vertellen. Benieuwd hoeveel mensen met zere tenen zijn buitengestapt bit.ly/KxSr89 3 hours ago
Tag cloud
android antwerpen app apple barcamp BIRM blog bloggen bloggers Borgerhout business model communicatieanalyse content experiment facebook Fictie gender Gent google htc internet ipad journalism journalistiek kindle Marketing media Nanowrimo nieuws online podcast privacy quote review Schaatsen social media sociologie tech45 technologie toekomst trends tumblr Twitter vioe woord van de week


Laatste reacties